This chapter is not based on how things behave in theoretical way but manifests how things are pragmatic rather than theoretical.

Science lets us to understand the facts about nature and how it works is its main characteristics. But one cannot rely on its theoretical part as one has to become a pragmatic rather than working on theories. Are theories important than experiment?
This conversation leads us in a world of inference where one cannot believe on inference and hence believe on perceptions but perception itself has inference so why one cannot rely much on inference? This is something like a probabilities and what we apply these probabilities on dark space where we only consider it (space) a frame or an event. This is same as one is in a web of uncertain conversation as theoretically we are clearer or pragmatically we are clearer to understand about nature’s journey.

Space according to Albert Einstein is like a fabric where it behaves like a ripples as we observe when we throw a stone / pebble into ocean (not only ocean anything that contains water). But no one is fully understand the concept of space because yet it is void and imaginary but plays a vital role in a geometry of a things as space is a big geometry that operates its smaller geometries like a branches of a giant tree.

However, space is not only the concentration of virtual particles but is something that has similar laws like our universe has but behaves opposite to it (universe). I next chapter, I will discuss what exactly space is and is there is any relation between it (space) and entanglement?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s