Philosophy of Death (Part-I)

Jaff Mason (#1) once argue, “Death has no subjective meaning”. This statement only creates panic in between philosophers and non-philosophers and compel them to think on philosophy of death. What is death? Is death personal? Can we consider death a error in quantum programming? When we think, this really smack us without notify. Although, Philosophy of death enlighten a way to immortality especially, when we want to go away from the concept of death and argue what is the actual philosophy on death. In this article, I endeavor to give an essence on philosophy of death.

We live because we understand, this sounds similar like one of the greatest Natural Philosopher, Meta-physician and Mathematician “Rene Descartes” (#2) once said, “Cogito, Ergo Sum” is a Latin philosophical  proposition  and when translate in English  is “I think therefore I am”. This statement manifests his understanding on “Self” (#3) and “Existence”. He took his keen interest in the field of metaphysics where he asked some of the most quintessential arguments including “What is the mark of the truth?”, “What is the actual nature of reality?”, ” Is there a benevolent God?” One of his most typical argument is “How does the human mind acquire knowledge?”   That time was the evidence of some of the great thinkers, philosophers, physicists and mathematicians those involve in a theory of universe, perception of mind and death, society amendment and even “Self” (#3) become a hot concept at that time. Rene Descartes was aware of such kind of theories and in early 1630’s, he was aware of William Harvey’s (#4) claim that the blood was circulate in the body. This kind of awareness is only for the understanding of current theories being raised by some of the philosophers at that time.

Rene Descartes was one of those who knew physics as well as mathematics and has significant knowledge on these subjects. He himself contribute in some of the mathematical description of nature and co-discover of sine law of refraction and a developer of a accurate model of rainbow. His intention was to replace all the main parts of Aristotelian (#5) physics. According to him, there is only one matter and it has no active form. He believed there is no void and hence there is no spatial container distinct from matter. He also believed that matter is divisible and what we see this matter in a form of space that constitutes the matter. He was one of those who knew that the planets revolve around the star / sun is not due to gravitational force but due to the fluid medium that rotates like a whirlpool or vortex (#6). Even, he believed that there is not a gravitational field or force that tends the objects to fall on the surface of earth but he is something like a antagonist here, his belief is based on “Whirling Particles” that is surrounded by an ether (#7). We know legendary physicist, (#8) Albert Einstein (1879-1955) was not born at that time when Rene Descartes argued on this kind of statement. This really blow our mind and compels us to think “how does Rene Descartes know his mind so accurately?” Nonetheless, he was the champion on Dualism (#9) where he work on dualism was the influenced of theology (#10) and physics (#11).

But, what is the meaning of Dualism (#9) and how it concomitant with death (#12) ? “Dualism” (#9). In Dualism, we have mind-body problem (#13) that tells us the story behind the separation between mind and body. But, Is really mind-body problem is a unique solution for understanding death? Let’s discuss, how?

(Note: I am discussing only Rene Descartes philosophy on mind, body, self and death. I am not considering his religious belief, scientific break through in this article.)

Mind- body problem is a purification by Rene Descartes as he demonstrated the existence of God and the human body and soul (#14). According to him, “Humans are a union of mind and body and thus give the idea of mind and body that are distinct but still joined closely”. But many contemporary readers didn’t digest this absurd statement and hence felt that this statement is not understood explicitly and difficult to grasp. He also argued on the difference between mind and body and said God is different form humans and also mind and body also are a different concept. In his argument, he said, “mind and body always make the two divisible. “But, mind was indivisible, when I consider the mind or myself  in so far I am barely a thinking thing, I am unable to distinguish any part within myself. I understand myself completely single and complete”.

(Note: The above statement is given by Rene Descartes on the basis on his experience)

The above statement manifests the concept of self and also interrelated with some basic aspects of death. For instance, when someone dies consider A (one who dies) and his friend, consider B heard the death of his friend (i.e. A). At the time of death, Person A (who is a friend of A) see and experience the death of his friend (A) but according to him, his friend is no more with him. Here, this is his personal experience. But, for A (friend of B) what he will feel / observe at that moment. Is he in a another dimension or with little aliens that assist him to understand his transcendence? Is this, perhaps not. Here, fiend of B (that is person A) still alive but not according to this physical body, but to his “Self”. “Self” that sounds similar like concept of  “Singularity” (#15) in physics and in mathematics. But, probably singularity is a way to define unknown facts about science and mathematics but “self” associates with “Nothing” like concept of “Nihilism” (#16).

The above excerpt shows an exact behavior of time with respect to “self” because when one person A dies, he feels he is not on the planet earth and become one with spatial activity and would never come again. This “Self” is his way to his (person A) own experience as according to person B or other persons, he died and would never come again. He died according to them, but not “they” (Person B and Other Persons). This stipulates the relation between mind, self and death as when one dies, “self” is his own experience and mind becomes one with “self” and what he thinks is nothing, just a thought of his mind that still in a search for ‘self” and when one attains “self” then his thoughts disappear and s / he becomes one with “self” (generally we see in case of “Brahma” (#17) a self-procreation).  

This is the first and natural philosophy on death and remains patchy, if not understood clearly.

References (under tags):

#1 Jaff Mason: is a professor at University of London and was a professor in London for 26 years.

#2 Rene Descartes: was a natural philosopher, physicist and mathematician and considerably known for his most typical statement “I think therefore I am”.

#3 Self: is a perception of mind which we can term as a “Self-Procreation” without being destroying or creating.

#4 William Harvey: was an English physician who made seminal to contribute in Anatomy and Physiology.

#5 Aristotle: was an ancient Greek Philosopher, popularly known for his contribution in  physics, mathematics, philosophy, art, thinking and many other fields.

#6 Vortex: In fluid dynamics, vortex is a region in a fluid in which the flow revolves around an axis line, which may be straight or curved.

#7 Ether: in ancient and medieval science is a material that fills the outer surface of the universe.

#8 Albert Einstein: was considered one of the influential physicist of all time. He is generally known for his contribution in physics especially in the field of Brownian Movement, Mass-Energy Equivalence and his greatest pillars in physics that is General Relativity and Special Relativity.

#9 Dualism: is a concept that describes the mind-body problem and was explicitly describe by Rene Descartes.

#10 Theology: is the study of the nature of the God and religious beliefs.

#11 Physics: is the study of the nature and behavior of matter and energy.

#12 Death: is the cessation of not being in the temporal world.

#13 Mind-Body Problem: was describe by Rene Descartes to clearly show the distinction between mind and body.

#14 Soul: In many religious sacred books, soul is that entity that survives after one’s death.

#15 Singularity: In physics, singularity is a point, where all mathematical laws break and violates many laws and principles.

#16 Nihilism: is the contradiction of all religious beliefs and adhere the concept of meaningless life.

#17  Brahma: is the God in Hinduism that is self-procreation and never ever ends.

Image Source: Google Images 

https://sunnyspace2.blogspot.in

https://creativespacetime.tumblr.com

 

Advertisements

Way to Eternal

A Short Poem on “Way to Eternal”.

Life inside a deep creation,

Where, thoughts become incredible,

Somewhere looks like a flowers,

A way to eternal.

In a space’s pinnacle,

Towards the self-imagination,

Where life find its destiny,

A way to eternal.

Image Source: Pinterest 

https://sunnyspace2.blogspot.in

https://creativespacetime.tumblr.com

Two Legends Begin a Journey

(Day and month both are same and two legends are meeting with each other and will solve the mystery of next universe)

https://creativespacetime.tumblr.com

https://sunnyspace2.blogspot.in

 

Consciousness

A Short Poem On “Consciousness”.

Travel like a light,

Hide it’s incredible journey,

Never see it’s destiny,

Lie inside a uncertain womb.

Image Source: Google Images

https://creativespacetime.tumblr.com

https://sunnyspace2.blogspot.in

What is Space?

Once again, welcome in the world of absurdity where thoughts become imaginative and travel without any verges. This post is going to be more exciting because I am discussing on space’s one of the most hidden reality and that is it’s darkness (looks black). What we observe in our day-to-day life is visible for us everything we see is visible to us and based on our vision we say what is that thing or prescribed things and also based on our experience. But in case of space, this is not as we become hapless and we have nothing to observe or experience.

However, space is dark (black) everywhere and there is nothing that manifests it’s existence even we do not know it (space) exists or not. Then how existence came in its pure form? Is this possible that space is responsible for creating every universes or it is just a false perception of mind? There are infinite possibilities that space is not just a probability or a weird cause but a well-defined existence and also some geometrical influence. This geometry is absurd for us at least in present world but will definitely solve this geometry. 

We are living that universe where uncertainties reside and where probabilities provoke existence of space. Whatever we called space but it is a well-defined geometrical pattern region where everything is static (not stationary but moves with constant velocity) and everything in it drive away from each other and flow like a river. But, what kind of geometry we have with space? Is this zero dimensional, one-dimensional, two-dimensional, three-dimensional, four-dimensional or more than 10,30, 50 or beyond our limits? May be, dimension does not matter but what matters is a pattern that is beyond our mind’s perception but still we imagine.

In my next post, I will discuss what kind of pattern is this? Hope you enjoy this post. Thanks!

Image Source: Google Images 

https://creativespacetime.tumblr.com

https://sunnyspace2.blogspot.in

Quantum Suicide

We are here again with lots of complex and fascinating things on “Quantum Suicide”. “Quantum Suicide” really perplex our minds and also compels us to think why nature is so complex, but sometimes elegant also. We are not at the verge of that mechanics that allows us to think positively about nature’s deepest root, may be we know how deep it is.

However, we are discussed “Quantum Infinite” in my previous chapter and that is something weird and chaos, where our expectations beyond our mind is shattered. Probably, some definitions about “Quantum Suicide” definitely lead us to the point of “Singularity” why? Because we have denser regions in space-time and if we will adhere them output is elegant and we will able to understand past, present and future simultaneously. But our current theories or laws break down their, not because we have insufficient mathematical principles but we are lack of experience with “quantum mechanics”.

Quantum Mechanics is not the single portion that allows us to understand everything explicitly. Why I am saying like this, this is because as we know we have two possibilities one is “Microscopic” and other one is “Macroscopic” beyond this can we create something different possibility? Yes, this is a painstaking question but really a matter of assert (will discuss in my next chapter). Similar case arises in “Quantum Suicide” we have two probabilities one is “Alive” and other is “Dead” then who will be the third one? Is this a synthesis of two cases both “Dead and Alive” or something else? Something else, here is not candid to explain because this one going to be more complex even beyond this.

Quantum Suicide however, provides some basic aspects of nature’s complex existence. Reason is we are there where everything is in lattice and if someone wants to open this first, he / she will understand it’s geometry (as usually we try to open the threads that synthesize to form an unstructured thread) and then solve how to travel from one place to another that already exists that I will discuss in my next chapter. Hope you enjoy this post. Thanks!

Image Source: Google Images 

https://creativespacetime.tumblr.com

https://sunnyspace2.blogspot.in

https://www.kalaage.net

Quantum Suicide (#2)

Hello, everyone. In this post, I will discuss some aspects and some facts about “Quantum Suicide” and why this is so intricate concept? In my previous post, I discussed “What is Quantum Suicide?” but here, I will discuss “Why this is so complicated for us to understand especially in practically?”

We know, what is “Quantum Suicide?” and why it is indispensable for “Many World Interpretation?” But we are still in chaos, “What happen to the individual person when he / she died and where his / her personal consciousness go?” Are we becoming “self” with universe or become one with dark space? We are not sure, whether we will become “self” or travel in an infinite dark space. Suppose, you have infinite universes and probably someone died and at that time of his / her last breathe, he / she will be in other universe, we don’t know whether he / she might be a child, daughter, son, father, mother, monsters, devil, old man, old women, beasts, tree, mountain or anything else. Then what he / she might be? If we say he / she might his / her self identical image then what will happen to past, present and future as our “self identical image” remains same everywhere and this seems we create our identical image / copy, is this? Answer is yes, this is. If we are in an infinite universes and in an elegant geometry of space.

We are identical and same, no matters what might be our future, present and past. Because in an infinite universes, we are not only depends on our past, present and future but also depends on our “Self Identical Image” and it remains forever. One cannot say universe splits when you died only. This case especially (Quantum Mechanics) is for everything as every moments are creating “Self Identical Image” whether one died or not.

However, this concept is really intricate, but if we understand it in a clear way we will definitely find something that completes “Quantum Mechanics” and behind this we will have something, may be new and weird. In my next post, I will discuss what will be the complete theory of “Quantum Mechanics”.

Hope you enjoy the post. Thanks!

Image Source: Google Images 

https://creativespacetime.tumblr.com

https://sunnyspace2.blogspot.in

https://www.linkedin.com/feed/

 

Once They Exist, But Where?

A Short Poem On “Once They Exist, But Where?”

Never find it’s existence,

Searches for a timeless world,

Nevertheless, it finds it’s reality,

Flow like a deep ocean inside itself.

Image Source: Google Images 

https://creativespacetime.tumblr.com

https://sunnyspace2.blogspot.in